THE PROBLEM:
Our global environment is now saturated with electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs) from satellites, radio transmitters, cellular networks, portable communication devices, smart technologies and more. While technological system providers assure us that no harm is caused by the electromagnetic frequencies employed in these systems, there is an increasing body of research indicating otherwise. For example, this study by Magda Havas and Jeffrey Marrongelle concludes “some individuals are highly sensitive to electromagnetic frequencies generated by a cordless phone base station at 2.4 GHz. In this double-blind, sham-controlled study, we document an increased heart rate, altered HRV, and changes in the sympathetic and parasympathetic control of the autonomic nervous system…” As well, people are experiencing numerous health challenges – such as headaches, allergies, fatigue, depression and cancers – that may in part be caused by long-term exposure to certain electromagnetic frequencies. [CITE]
Fortunately, researchers Dirk Meijer and Hans Geesink in the Netherlands have identified, through meta-analysis of over 500 scientific papers dating from the 1950’s to the present, what they call an “algorithm for coherent life processes” that produces a set of frequencies spanning 127 octaves of electromagnetic and acoustic waves that are found to be “life-sustaining” — that is, they support healthy cellular functioning. From their paper entitled Quantum Wave Information of Life Revealed: An Algorithm for Electromagnetic Frequencies that Create Stability of Biological Order, with Implications for Brain Function and Consciousness, the authors state:
“An algorithm of multiple scales is proposed based upon a tempered Pythagorean scale and composed only by connecting approximated stacks of fifth’s (frequency ratio of 2:3), and octaves (ratio of 1:2), while 12 discrete frequencies fit within each octave. By making use of scales of fifths and octaves there is an algorithmic relation between the basic frequencies, the overtones and harmonic frequencies... If a frequency of one cycle per second is used, which is 1 Hertz, then all frequencies in all scales can be calculated. Under these conditions preferred coherent frequencies... of a so-called ‘reference scale’ can be calculated: 256.0, 269.9, 288.0, 303.1, 324.0, 341.15, 364.7, 384.0, 404.5, 432.0, 455.1, 486.0 Hz.
This particular scale is called a ‘tempered Pythagorean scale’ and its patterns of har- monic and coherent waves can be extended to all frequency scales: all lower and higher preferred frequencies are entangled by this scale and can be simply calculated by mul- tiplying or dividing each preferred frequency of this reference scale by powers of 2. In this manner about 127 scales having coherent algorithm frequencies can be derived from 0.001-Hertz till the highest possible frequency of ≈6.2x10^34 Hz. The latter is related to the smallest theorized unit of distance of the Planck length, as represented in a mathematical algorithm of coherent frequencies.”
Here’s a chart showing data points of 315 beneficial frequencies (green) and 171 detrimental frequencies (red) that fall in between the life-sustaining bands (normalized to the twelve-frequency reference scale described above):
In Appendix 3 from their paper, Geesink & Meijer present a list of “EM frequencies extracted from the biological studies, versus the calculated (via mathematical algorithm) derived frequencies”. The aforementioned 2.4 GHz cordless phone frequency is listed in the Negative Effects set of frequencies presented (see lower-right section of table).
Imagine applying the “algorithm for coherent life processes” to effectively “tune” EMF-based technological systems so that they utilize beneficial frequencies, rather than detrimental ones. There is practical evidence that this would create harmony with our bodies, emotions and minds, whereas currently, either inadvertently or by design, many existing systems may be causing harm.